DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Cima vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLincoln
CimaModelLS
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4130 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
270 HPPower245 HP
371 NmTorque360 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/65 R15 HTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4945 mmLength4925 mm
1780 mmWidth1860 mm
1435 mmHeight1425 mm
1730 KgWeight1710 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2908 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Cima and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…