DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Ford Thunderbird vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLincoln
ThunderbirdModelLS
2001Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
256 HPPower245 HP
362 NmTorque360 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4732 mmLength4925 mm
1829 mmWidth1860 mm
1323 mmHeight1425 mm
1680 KgWeight1710 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2908 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Ford Thunderbird and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…