DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2001 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
LSModelThunderbird
2000Model year2001
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,0 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
245 HPPower256 HP
360 NmTorque362 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4732 mm
1860 mmWidth1829 mm
1425 mmHeight1323 mm
1710 KgWeight1680 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2723 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2001 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…