DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
LincolnMakeVolvo
LSModelS80
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h8,2 s
190 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
190 HPPower204 HP
270 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
4925 mmLength4822 mm
1860 mmWidth1832 mm
1425 mmHeight1434 mm
1665 KgWeight1550 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…