DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeLincoln
XMModelLS
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2963 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
260 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4925 mm
1794 mmWidth1860 mm
1389 mmHeight1425 mm
1500 KgWeight1665 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2908 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…