2000 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Ford Taurus vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Lincoln
LS
Lincoln LS 3.0 V6 24V (190 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Lincoln LS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationLincoln LS
FordMakeLincoln
TaurusModelLS
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationLincoln LS
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
271 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationLincoln LS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationLincoln LS
5019 mmLength4925 mm
1854 mmWidth1860 mm
1425 mmHeight1425 mm
1530 KgWeight1665 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2908 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Taurus and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…