DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeVolkswagen
LSModelBora
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,4 s
190 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
190 HPPower204 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank63 lt
12 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4376 mm
1860 mmWidth1735 mm
1425 mmHeight1446 mm
1665 KgWeight1570 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…