DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
LSModelTaurus
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
270 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength5019 mm
1860 mmWidth1854 mm
1425 mmHeight1425 mm
1665 KgWeight1530 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…