DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
LSModelGalaxy
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
190 HPPower204 HP
270 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
12 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4641 mm
1860 mmWidth1810 mm
1425 mmHeight1732 mm
1665 KgWeight1700 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…