DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeCitroen
LSModelXM
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
190 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
270 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4708 mm
1860 mmWidth1794 mm
1425 mmHeight1389 mm
1665 KgWeight1500 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…