DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAlfa Romeo
Range RoverModel166
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
179 km/hTop speed241 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
177 HPPower220 HP
390 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption18,3 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/55 R19Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4720 mm
1955 mmWidth1815 mm
1860 mmHeight1406 mm
2500 KgWeight1510 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…