DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-5 vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeLand Rover
9-5ModelRange Rover
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
215 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
176 HPPower177 HP
350 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank100 lt
10 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4950 mm
1792 mmWidth1955 mm
1475 mmHeight1860 mm
1685 KgWeight2500 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-5 and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…