DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo S80 vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeLand Rover
S80ModelRange Rover
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
235 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
200 HPPower177 HP
280 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank100 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
8 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/55R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4822 mmLength4950 mm
1832 mmWidth1955 mm
1434 mmHeight1860 mm
1530 KgWeight2500 Kg
2791 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo S80 and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…