DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
Range RoverModelS80
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
179 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
177 HPPower200 HP
390 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size215/55R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4822 mm
1955 mmWidth1832 mm
1860 mmHeight1434 mm
2500 KgWeight1530 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…