DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Toyota Camry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Camry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
Range RoverModelCamry
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2994 cc
177 HPPower200 HP
390 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size205/65 R15; 205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4864 mm
1955 mmWidth1806 mm
1860 mmHeight1400 mm
2500 KgWeight1465 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Toyota Camry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Camry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…