DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Toyota Altezza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Altezza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
Range RoverModelAltezza
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
179 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
177 HPPower220 HP
390 NmTorque294 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/55 R19Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4400 mm
1955 mmWidth1725 mm
1860 mmHeight1420 mm
2500 KgWeight1510 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Toyota Altezza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Altezza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…