DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Saab 9-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSaab
Range RoverModel9-5
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
179 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
177 HPPower176 HP
390 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
100 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption10 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4805 mm
1955 mmWidth1792 mm
1860 mmHeight1475 mm
2500 KgWeight1685 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…