DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLincoln
Range RoverModelLS
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
179 km/hTop speed219 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
177 HPPower213 HP
390 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4925 mm
1955 mmWidth1869 mm
1860 mmHeight1425 mm
2500 KgWeight1670 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2908 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…