DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelGalaxy
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
179 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
177 HPPower204 HP
390 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/55 R19Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4641 mm
1955 mmWidth1810 mm
1860 mmHeight1732 mm
2500 KgWeight1700 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…