E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC Aceca vs 1999 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–83.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW Z3
ACMakeBMW
AcecaModelZ3
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW Z3
5,6 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3506 ccEngine displacement3246 cc
354 HPPower325 HP
407 NmTorque350 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank51 lt
20 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
255/45 R18Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW Z3
4660 mmLength4025 mm
1890 mmWidth1740 mm
1340 mmHeight1268 mm
1615 KgWeight1450 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2459 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC Aceca and 1999 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS2000 AC AcecaAC ACE vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1999 AC AcecaVS2000 AC AcecaAC Aceca vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1999 BMW Z3VS2000 AC AcecaBMW Z3 vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1999 BMW M3VS2000 AC AcecaBMW M3 vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1998 Daimler DaimlerVS2000 AC AcecaDaimler Daimler vs AC Aceca1998 and 2000 model years

Comments are loading…