DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC Aceca vs 2003 Audi A2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Aceca

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 27.25 points.

82.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC AcecaSpecificationAudi A2
ACMakeAudi
AcecaModelA2
2000Model year2003
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

AC AcecaSpecificationAudi A2
5,6 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
250 km/hTop speed173 km/h
3506 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
354 HPPower75 HP
407 NmTorque195 Nm
8Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

AC AcecaSpecificationAudi A2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank34 lt
20 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC AcecaSpecificationAudi A2
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
255/45 R18Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

AC AcecaSpecificationAudi A2
4660 mmLength3826 mm
1890 mmWidth1673 mm
1340 mmHeight1553 mm
1615 KgWeight1095 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2405 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC Aceca and 2003 Audi A2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 27.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…