DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lancia Phedra vs 2003 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeSsangYong
PhedraModelMusso
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
185 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
190 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption16,4 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4640 mm
1863 mmWidth1864 mm
1760 mmHeight1735 mm
1575 KgWeight1895 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lancia Phedra and 2003 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…