DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2003 Lancia Phedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeLancia
Sm-xModelPhedra
2002Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
131 HPPower136 HP
186 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4750 mm
1695 mmWidth1863 mm
1750 mmHeight1760 mm
1330 KgWeight1575 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2003 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…