DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Lancia Phedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationLancia Phedra
MGMakeLancia
ZSModelPhedra
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationLancia Phedra
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
19 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
117 HPPower136 HP
160 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationLancia Phedra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationLancia Phedra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationLancia Phedra
4520 mmLength4750 mm
1700 mmWidth1863 mm
1390 mmHeight1760 mm
1125 KgWeight1575 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…