DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lancia Phedra vs 2002 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeHonda
PhedraModelSm-x
2003Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
8Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
136 HPPower131 HP
190 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4750 mmLength3950 mm
1863 mmWidth1695 mm
1760 mmHeight1750 mm
1575 KgWeight1330 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lancia Phedra and 2002 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…