DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lancia Phedra vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lancia PhedraSpecificationGAZ 31
LanciaMakeGAZ
PhedraModel31
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Lancia PhedraSpecificationGAZ 31
11,2 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
185 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
136 HPPower110 HP
190 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lancia PhedraSpecificationGAZ 31
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Lancia PhedraSpecificationGAZ 31
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Lancia PhedraSpecificationGAZ 31
4750 mmLength4870 mm
1863 mmWidth1800 mm
1760 mmHeight1422 mm
1575 KgWeight1560 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lancia Phedra and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…