DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lancia Dedra vs 2000 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeCitroen
DedraModelSaxo
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
180 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
127 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4340 mmLength3737 mm
1700 mmWidth1620 mm
1417 mmHeight1360 mm
1060 KgWeight920 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lancia Dedra and 2000 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…