DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1999 Lancia Dedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLancia
CarismaModelDedra
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
137 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4340 mm
1710 mmWidth1700 mm
1405 mmHeight1417 mm
1080 KgWeight1060 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1999 Lancia Dedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…