DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Saxo vs 1999 Lancia Dedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeLancia
SaxoModelDedra
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
187 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3737 mmLength4340 mm
1620 mmWidth1700 mm
1360 mmHeight1417 mm
920 KgWeight1060 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Saxo and 1999 Lancia Dedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…