DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Kia Retona vs 2002 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
KiaMakeGAZ
RetonaModel31
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
15,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
150 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
128 HPPower114 HP
175 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
4000 mmLength4897 mm
1745 mmWidth1840 mm
1845 mmHeight1472 mm
1480 KgWeight1550 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Kia Retona and 2002 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…