DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationKia Retona
MGMakeKia
ZSModelRetona
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationKia Retona
9,0 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
19 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower128 HP
160 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationKia Retona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationKia Retona
4520 mmLength4000 mm
1700 mmWidth1745 mm
1390 mmHeight1845 mm
1125 KgWeight1480 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…