2002 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 2.0 DiTD (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score53.25/100
2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V (128 Hp) 2002Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
MazdaMakeKia
323ModelRetona
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
12,2 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
178 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower128 HP
220 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
4200 mmLength4000 mm
1705 mmWidth1745 mm
1410 mmHeight1845 mm
1175 KgWeight1480 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…