2003 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (83 Hp) 2003Overall Score40.5/100
2003 Kia Retona vs 2003 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DI 16V (65 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationOpel Combo
KiaMakeOpel
RetonaModelCombo
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationOpel Combo
20,5 s0–100 km/h18,5 s
124 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
83 HPPower65 HP
195 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationOpel Combo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
10 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationOpel Combo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75R15Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationOpel Combo
4000 mmLength4320 mm
1745 mmWidth1685 mm
1835 mmHeight1800 mm
1394 KgWeight1260 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2715 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Retona and 2003 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…