2003 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DI 16V (65 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
2003 Opel Combo vs 2003 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (83 Hp) 2003Overall Score40.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Retona
OpelMakeKia
ComboModelRetona
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Retona
18,5 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
147 km/hTop speed124 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
65 HPPower83 HP
130 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Retona
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size215/75R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Retona
4320 mmLength4000 mm
1685 mmWidth1745 mm
1800 mmHeight1835 mm
1260 KgWeight1394 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Opel Combo and 2003 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…