DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Sportage vs 2003 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeKia
SportageModelRetona
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
130 km/hTop speed124 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
63 HPPower83 HP
127 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size215/75R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4245 mmLength4000 mm
1730 mmWidth1745 mm
1650 mmHeight1835 mm
1465 KgWeight1394 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Sportage and 2003 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…