DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Retona vs 2003 Kia Sportage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeKia
RetonaModelSportage
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

20,5 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
124 km/hTop speed130 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
83 HPPower63 HP
195 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75R15Tyre size205/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4245 mm
1745 mmWidth1730 mm
1835 mmHeight1650 mm
1394 KgWeight1465 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Retona and 2003 Kia Sportage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…