2003 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (83 Hp) 2003Overall Score40.5/100
2003 Kia Retona vs 2002 Chevrolet Niva Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Chevrolet
Niva
Chevrolet Niva 1.7 i (80 Hp) 2002Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationChevrolet Niva
KiaMakeChevrolet
RetonaModelNiva
2003Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationChevrolet Niva
20,5 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
124 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1690 cc
83 HPPower80 HP
195 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationChevrolet Niva
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationChevrolet Niva
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75R15Tyre size205/70 R15; 205/75 R15
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationChevrolet Niva
4000 mmLength4048 mm
1745 mmWidth1770 mm
1835 mmHeight1652 mm
1394 KgWeight1350 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Retona and 2002 Chevrolet Niva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…