DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A6 vs 2003 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationKia Optima
AudiMakeKia
A6ModelOptima
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationKia Optima
9,3 s0–100 km/h—
224 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
170 HPPower176 HP
230 NmTorque229 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationKia Optima
4796 mmLength4745 mm
1810 mmWidth1815 mm
1453 mmHeight1420 mm
1480 KgWeight1450 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A6 and 2003 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…