2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.5 V6 (176 Hp) 2003Overall Score71.5/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 BMW Z4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • BMW
Z4
BMW Z4 2.5i (192 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z4
KiaMakeBMW
OptimaModelZ4
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z4
—0–100 km/h7,0 s
209 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
176 HPPower192 HP
229 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/60 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z4
4745 mmLength4091 mm
1815 mmWidth1781 mm
1420 mmHeight1299 mm
1450 KgWeight1335 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2495 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…