2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.5 V6 (176 Hp) 2003Overall Score71.5/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 BMW X3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.5i (192 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
KiaMakeBMW
OptimaModelX3
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
—0–100 km/h8,9 s
209 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
176 HPPower192 HP
229 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption15,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption11,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
205/60 R15Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
4745 mmLength4569 mm
1815 mmWidth1853 mm
1420 mmHeight1674 mm
1450 KgWeight1815 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2795 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…