DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Chevrolet Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelAstra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
207 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower128 HP
180 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank52 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4110 mm
1815 mmWidth1709 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1478 KgWeight1100 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2614 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Chevrolet Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…