2000 • Lancia
Zeta
Lancia Zeta 2.0 JTD (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Lancia Zeta vs 2000 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Lancia Zeta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia ZetaSpecificationKia Optima
LanciaMakeKia
ZetaModelOptima
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Lancia ZetaSpecificationKia Optima
14,8 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
175 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
250 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia ZetaSpecificationKia Optima
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia ZetaSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia ZetaSpecificationKia Optima
4470 mmLength4745 mm
1834 mmWidth1815 mm
1714 mmHeight1420 mm
1615 KgWeight1478 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Lancia Zeta and 2000 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Zeta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…