DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Astra vs 2000 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKia
AstraModelOptima
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
196 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
128 HPPower136 HP
188 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4110 mmLength4745 mm
1709 mmWidth1815 mm
1430 mmHeight1420 mm
1100 KgWeight1478 Kg
2614 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Astra and 2000 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…