2000 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Laguna
Renault Laguna 2.0 16V (K56D/M) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Renault Laguna
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Laguna
KiaMakeRenault
OptimaModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Laguna
10,6 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
207 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
136 HPPower139 HP
180 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Laguna
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption12,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Laguna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Laguna
4745 mmLength4620 mm
1815 mmWidth1752 mm
1420 mmHeight1448 mm
1478 KgWeight1400 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…