DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Opel Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeOpel
OptimaModelFrontera
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
207 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4658 mm
1815 mmWidth1814 mm
1420 mmHeight1740 mm
1478 KgWeight1722 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2702 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Opel Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…