2000 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Lancia Zeta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Lancia
Zeta
Lancia Zeta 2.0 JTD (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Lancia Zeta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Zeta
KiaMakeLancia
OptimaModelZeta
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Zeta
10,6 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
207 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Zeta
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Zeta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationLancia Zeta
4745 mmLength4470 mm
1815 mmWidth1834 mm
1420 mmHeight1714 mm
1478 KgWeight1615 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Lancia Zeta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Zeta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…