2002 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.8 (134 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Kia Optima vs 2002 BMW Z3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • BMW
Z3
BMW Z3 1.9 (118 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z3
KiaMakeBMW
OptimaModelZ3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z3
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1836 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
134 HPPower118 HP
169 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW Z3
4745 mmLength4050 mm
1815 mmWidth1740 mm
1420 mmHeight1288 mm
1320 KgWeight1220 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Kia Optima and 2002 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…