DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Freelander vs 2002 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeKia
FreelanderModelOptima
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
117 HPPower134 HP
160 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4745 mm
1809 mmWidth1815 mm
1708 mmHeight1420 mm
1510 KgWeight1320 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Freelander and 2002 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…