DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2002 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 147

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeKia
147ModelOptima
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
115 HPPower134 HP
275 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4170 mmLength4745 mm
1729 mmWidth1815 mm
1439 mmHeight1420 mm
1345 KgWeight1320 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2002 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…