2002 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.8 (134 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Kia Optima vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
KiaMakeLand Rover
OptimaModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1836 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
134 HPPower117 HP
169 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4745 mmLength4368 mm
1815 mmWidth1809 mm
1420 mmHeight1708 mm
1320 KgWeight1510 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Kia Optima and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…